Is OPEN Just another SOPA or PIPA?

SOPA and PIPA in a strange way made us all apart of history. Most likely if you’re reading this you were probably one of the 13 million people who openly opposed SOPA and PIPA. We were apart of the worlds largest protest and I’m proud to say that I did my part. I wrote several letters to my law makers and even called their offices. I signed petitions and worked hard to spread the word. Organizations like Automattic and Mozilla provided us with resources to make this all possible and last Wednesday several sites “blacked out” to show their disapproval of the bills.

Last night I got my first response from all my “crys” to stop the bills. Congressman Jim Langevin (email him here: james.langevin@mail.house.gov) emailed me with a rather long email describing SOPA, PIPA and now OPEN. His email is below for you to read.

It seems to me that our Legislative branch is hell bent on creating laws to protect big corporations form internet piracy. I continue to disagree with this being a US lawmakers issue. The corporations who have these bill writers ears are pushing their agenda and are more interested in punishing people who don’t follow their rules rather than solving the problem internally. The truth is there are always going to be pirates, people are always going to share music, movies and more… Shutting down these websites will just spring up new ways to circumvent copyright laws.

[note]

“On Wednesday, Jan. 18, thousands of websites, such as Wikipedia, Reddit and WordPress, blacked out their websites to protest the legislation intended to prevent digital piracy in what was the largest protest in tech world history.” Read More Here

[/note]

To be absolutely clear I do not wear an eye patch myself, I do not condone it, I don’t torrent, I don’t download software, movies or music. My point is that the companies most affected by piracy could create better solutions to consuming their media to help alleviate the “need” to be a “pirate”. A perfect example of this is Adobe, who was faced with huge piracy numbers of their software and instead of continually attacking their users they created a subscription model to create a lower barrier of entry for their products.

Congressman Langevin is a supporter of the:

The Online Protection and Enforcement of Digital Trade Act (OPEN Act), a bill introduced in the United States Congress proposed as an alternative to the Stop Online Piracy Act and PROTECT IP Act, by Senator Ron Wyden of Oregon, a Democrat, and Representative Darrell Issa of California, a Republican – Wikipedia

Which at the moment seems like the lesser of three evils. The bill creates stronger regulations on how to define an “infringing site” and it empowers the United States International Trade Commission instead of the United States Justice Department to make the decisions regarding how to deal with those sites.

We worked together to shelve SOPA and PIPA, does this make OPEN a reasonable compromise? What are your thoughts?

Congressman Langevin’s email:

Dear Jesse:

Thank you for contacting me regarding internet piracy and recent legislative proposals to combat it. I appreciate your concerns and welcome the opportunity to correspond with you.

From my days registering trademarks as the Rhode Island Secretary of State, I have had a serious interest in protecting intellectual property. Artists and innovators in our state and around the country deserve to be rewarded for their hard work and creativity, and our national emphasis on strong copyright and patent protections has also fostered the growth of world-leading businesses and cultural institutions. Unfortunately, Americans are increasingly facing threats to their intellectual property from countries that lack our concern for copyright, and our government lacks the means to prevent damage to the economy from trade in counterfeit goods and the sale of copyrighted works.

The Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA), introduced in the House by Rep. Lamar Smith, and its companion legislation, Senator Patrick Leahy’s PROTECT IP Act (PIPA), were intended to provide internet service providers and law enforcement agencies the tools to combat foreign copyright infringement. Unfortunately, their methods are incompatible with both the openness that is the internet’s hallmark, and important cybersecurity protocols.

SOPA and PIPA would allow intellectual property holders to bring suit against infringing sites and could compel internet advertising services and payment processors to cease doing business with a site, cutting off its two largest revenue generators. The definition of “infringing site” used by both acts is overly broad and could easily result in legitimate sites being cut off from funding.

SOPA and PIPA also provide for civil action initiated by the Attorney General, which could ultimately require “infringing sites” to be delisted by search providers and blocked by internet service providers. The original proposal for blocking sites would have completely undermined the secure domain name system (DNSSEC), one of the building blocks for improved cybersecurity. Although that particular provision may be removed before the bills reach the House floor, any site blocking or web-search censoring runs directly counter to American values and also gives cover for repressive regimes that currently use such measures. The US is the world leader online, and we should lead by example by continuing to ensure the government has the lightest touch possible when regulating the Internet, only making exceptions in cases where our citizens are directly threatened or harmed.

For that reason, I was proud to join my colleague Rep. Darrell Issa in introducing the Online Protection and Enforcement of Digital Trade (OPEN) Act. Unlike SOPA and PIPA, the OPEN Act uses a constrained definition of “infringing site,” to ensure that only those who willfully engage in counterfeiting or other intellectual property theft will be targeted. The OPEN Act confines its reach to payment processing companies and advertisers, making it a powerful tool for law enforcement without censoring the open web. Finally, the OPEN Act relies on the International Trade Commission (ITC), a well-respected panel of copyright experts, to determine whether a site is a violator rather than relying on general courts. I am confident that the swift passage of the OPEN Act will protect intellectual property owners and maintain the open nature of the internet.

Thank you again for contacting me on this incredibly important issue. I will continue to fight for internet freedom and cybersecurity as PIPA, SOPA, and OPEN move through their various committees. I also invite you to sign-up for my monthly e-newsletter to stay up-to-date on active legislative issues. Finally, please don’t hesitate to contact me on this or any other area of concern.

Sincerely,

Jim Langevin
Member of Congress
***
If you would like to sign up for my e-newsletter, please click here.
For more information about my work in Congress, please visit my website.

One thought on “Is OPEN Just another SOPA or PIPA?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s